TWITTER FEED

ACLU_MD: RT @LinesBetweenUs: "I just want to be a citizen again ... am I asking too much?" Today on Lines: giving ex-felons a second chance. http://…

May 24, 2013 11:10 AM

ACLU_MD: RT @ACLU: .@ACLU statement on President Obama's speech: http://t.co/7c7snO6TBL #targetedkillings #dronewars #GTMO #Gitmo #CloseGitmo

May 24, 2013 09:47 AM

ACLU_MD: RT @ACLU: An Unexpected Reaction: Why a Science Experiment Gone Bad Doesn't Make Me a Criminal: http://t.co/V1iL4Xf8GH Kiera tells her stor…

May 24, 2013 09:47 AM

Libertywatchbutton3
Aclustudio_black

Welcome to our new website!

We are proud to announce the ACLU of Maryland's new website. Special features include a custom search engine that helps users find the information they need on the issues they care about. 

 

Please look around and let us know what you think. 

Comments

Might sound odd, but it's right.When you're in a cubicle in a pulbic loo, you have an expectation of privacy, i.e., you don't expect someone to just barge right into the cubicle without checking if anyone's in there first, right? Apply this to yourself just sitting in a pulbic loo doing your business. That's what you'd expect, I hope.Logically speaking, the theoretical person barging into the cubicle without checking if anyone's in there does not know what's going on in the cubicle, so the expectation of privacy can't logically depend on what the person / people inside the cubicle are doing. If it exists for the person sitting there with a newspaper and using the cubicle for its intended purpose, it also logically applies to the two people in the cubicle going at it, no?

Share your thoughts

Why do we ask this?