Today at the ACLU of Maryland, we are taking our data back and we want you to join us.


Earlier this week the ACLU of Maryland sent requests to state and local police departments for more information about Automatic License Plate Readers (ALPRs). ALPRs are cameras that are mounted on the back of police cars or on the side of the road that record your license plate every time you pass by. Currently, there are over 320 of these ALPRs in Maryland.  


Many of these ALPRs are linked to Maryland's "fusion center", known as the Maryland Coordination and Analysis Center, where the license plate information is sent and stored in a central database. 


Thanks to our request, we already know that the data is retained there for at least a year, but it is unclear just how long individual police departments plan to keep it (or whether the centralized storage could expand). Maryland needs legal protections to limit the collection, retention, and sharing of our travel information - and we need these rules right away.


As use of Automatic License Plate Readers expands, and as more and more data about our travels is stored over time, this system becomes a warrantless tracking tool and we, as Maryland residents, have a right to know what information has been recorded and stored about us.


That is why I have requested my own data from the Maryland Coordination and Analysis Center and am asking you to do the same.


Take action to protect your right to privacy. Simply fill out and mail this prepared template, attach a copy of your Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration Registration Certificate, and take action today!




David Rocah

Staff Attorney, ACLU of Maryland


Working in a public soochl myself, I can tell you that soochls and administrators will come up with any legal reason to get rid of a position in the present economic and anti-teaching client. Also, charter soochls do not have the same rights as a regular public soochl despite the fact that they are public. In fact, charters can be revoked at a whim disbanding a whole soochl if enough evidence exists that it is not upholding the charter.Beth, despite the fact that the situation was smoothed over with alternate schedules, I have no doubt that the administrators were probably still looking to get at someone who made waves or what they perceive as making waves. The fact is though at this time she will not be supported, but she should have taken action after the insensitive comments made by the HR person because that was discrimination at the times. I do think women need to stand up for their rights in this type of situation because so much has been taken away from breastfeeding moms as it is. I mean look at a lot of countries in Europe and I think Canada as well. They obviously value the importance of mother/baby bonding because women there get an automatic 6 months off after the birth WITH PAY in an effort to support breastfeeding. The fact is that this country does not care about its children (or breastfeeding and time off paid would be the norm) and certainly do not care about women rights but only that Americans continue to work, work, work and pay taxes. It is a sad state of affairs that we even have to have this discussion, and that other women look down on other women for desiring the best for their children because it might be perceived as private or worse sexual or an inconvenience. One day I hope this country gets over its greedy ways and people stop making judgments of the natural choices of others.

Wrote the fusion center and was told they have no data for me

Share your thoughts

Why do we ask this?