Placeholder image

No Spy Planes Over Baltimore

Last updated on April 10, 2020

No Spy Planes Over Baltimore

This embed will serve content from {{ domain }}. See our privacy statement

With police spy planes, everywhere Baltimore goes, the government would always know.

Spy planes carry sophisticated cameras developed for the military, mounted on airplanes, that can see the entire city, and that track the movement of every person or vehicle moving outside. Because the video imagery is stored, it is a virtual time machine, allowing police to go to any time and place and track everyone who came and went from or to that place. They will use the video to identify people, by tracking where they come from and go to, and by linking movement tracks to images from ground-based surveillance cameras and data from license plate readers.

That’s why a lawsuit was filed against the Baltimore Police Department by Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle, grassroots think tank that advances the public policy interests of Black people in Baltimore; Erricka Bridgeford, co-founder of the Baltimore Ceasefire 365 project; and Kevin James, a community organizer and hip-hop musician – with the support of the ACLU of Maryland and the national ACLU.

No Spy Planes Over Baltimore - red overlay over a map of Baltimore and a spy plane with ACLU and ACLU of Maryland logos

The police spy plane program is equivalent to having a police officer follow every Baltimore City resident when they go outside, just in case they commit a crime. If this happened with an actual police officer and not technology, the First and Fourth Amendment violations would be glaring. Using a policy spy plane to do this is no different.

Baltimore is the last place a police spy plane program should be used. Why?

  1. Baltimore Police have a terrible history of racial bias and lack of accountability for abuses, including secretly using this and similar technology for other purposes such as surveilling Black Lives Matter protests.
  2. The unprecedented spy plane system would violate our rights by chilling our rights to free speech and assembly. A spy plane would link to, and supercharge the city’s ground-based surveillance cameras, which are already disproportionately located in Baltimore’s Black neighborhoods.
  3. Baltimore should not allow an out-of-state businessman to profit from selling spy plane data he collects about them to the police and other companies. For a private company, this about making money off of Baltimore’s pain.

If the Baltimore Police Department moves forward with this mass surveillance program, Baltimore City is just the beginning. What happens here will determine what happens in the rest of the country. The private company behind these spy planes already has its sights set on other cities across the country. We foresee this technology being deployed in other cities that have a majority of Black residents, too, and where activists have been rising up against abuse and killings by police.

Let’s stop the Baltimore Police spy plane program.


VIDEOS

Real News Network: Unconstitutional Power Grab? Baltimore Police Sued Over Spy Plane (April 14, 2020)

This embed will serve content from {{ domain }}. See our privacy statement

No Spy Planes Over Baltimore City - Press Conference (April 9, 2020)

This embed will serve content from {{ domain }}. See our privacy statement

ACLU of Maryland Opposes Spy Planes in Baltimore (March 24, 2020)

This embed will serve content from {{ domain }}. See our privacy statement

LEGAL CASE

Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle v. Baltimore City Police Department (Filed on April 9, 2020)
Learn More


PRESS RELEASES

ACLU, Baltimore Leaders Comment on Federal Court Decision on Pilot Aerial Surveillance Case in Baltimore (April 24, 2020)
READ

Baltimore Leaders, ACLU File Suit Challenging Pilot Aerial Surveillance Program in Baltimore (April 9, 2020)
Read


LETTER

Protest Letter from David Rocah, senior staff attorney at ACLU of Maryland, to Board of Estimates (March 24, 2020)
Read


FROM THE NATIONAL ACLU

PRESS RELEASE: ACLU Challenges Pilot Aerial Surveillance Program in Baltimore (April 9, 2020)
READ

BLOG: ACLU Lawsuit Over Baltimore Spy Planes Sets Up Historic Surveillance Battle (April 9, 2020)
Read

BLOG: Baltimore Aerial Surveillance Program Retained Data Despite 45-Day Privacy Policy Limit (October 25, 2016)
READ

BLOG: Baltimore Police Secretly Running Aerial Mass-Surveillance Eye in the Sky (August 24, 2016)
READ

BLOG: What’s Spooky About the FBI’s Fleet of Spy Planes? (June 2, 2015)
READ

BLOG: Mysterious Planes Over Baltimore Spark Surveillance Suspicions (May 6,2015)
READ

Featured Cases

Court Case
Apr 09, 2020
Police spy plane over map of Baltimore with a red overlay
  • Racial Justice|
  • +2 Issues

Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle v. Baltimore City Police Department

The Plaintiffs in this suit reached a strong settlement with the Baltimore Police Department (BPD) following the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling finding the BPD’s pilot aerial surveillance program unconstitutional.

Related Content

Press Release
Jun 24, 2021
Victory stamp is angled over the first page of the 4th Circuit Opinion in the sply plane case, Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle v. Baltimore Police Department.

Federal Appeals Court Rules Baltimore Aerial Surveillance Program is Unconstitutional

Press Release
Apr 09, 2020
Police spy plane over map of Baltimore with a red overlay
  • Privacy & Technology|
  • +2 Issues

Baltimore Leaders, ACLU File Suit Challenging Pilot Aerial Surveillance Program in Baltimore

Press Release
Aug 21, 2019
ACLU of Maryland abbreviated logo
  • Police Practices|
  • +1 Issue

ACLU of Maryland Opposes Spy Planes in Baltimore

Press Release
Dec 20, 2019
Aerial view of Baltimore with red line drawn around area under mass surveillance.
  • Privacy & Technology|
  • +1 Issue

ACLU and CJSJ Oppose Plan to Reinstate Permanent Surveillance of Baltimore Residents