Podcast

The transcript is available below.

Life in prison was the verdict for teenagers Ransom Watkins, Andrew Stewart, and Alfred Chestnut in 1983. They were wrongfully intimidated and interrogated by police and sentenced for a crime they did not commit.

The three were eventually exonerated but were effectively robbed of 36 years of life, in addition to the ever-present trauma that comes with incarceration. A devastating reminder of the issues within our legal justice system, and why children's rights must be protected.

Defending the rights of children shouldn't be optional, and yet every day in Maryland, children entangled in the legal justice system were questioned without a parent, guardian, or attorney present. Which is why in 2022, the ACLU of Maryland and our partners successfully passed the Child Interrogation Protection Act which requires an attorney be consulted before a child is interrogated by law enforcement.

On this episode, you'll hear from Ransom Watkins of the Exonerated Harlem Park Three about his life, legacy, and how the man in him still struggles with the brutality the child in him has endured.

Learn more about our 2024 legislative priorities, including defending children's due process rights.

Listen to the podcast on YouTube

No One Was Protecting Is" - Ransom Watkins of the Exonerated Harlem Park 3. Watkins is a Black man looking at the camera wearing a blue baseball hat, glasses, and a blue shirt.

Producer and Host: Nehemiah Bester, communications strategist at ACLU of Maryland

This podcast was recorded on Piscataway land.


TRANSCRIPT

00:00 – 00:18
Ransom Watkins
You looking at kids who ain't been in trouble. So, for us, this is like a nightmare. You're in an uncomfortable environment without anybody that you know, and you don't have your parents. Because, you know, that's the first thing that kids ask for is their parents. So, with me, it was my father. Like where my father at? Cause you got me in a room by myself, and I need somebody in my family.

00:18 – 00:30
Ransom Watkins
Because I don't know what's going on. And I'm confused because I told you the truth. But you keep trying to get me to say something, that's not the truth.

00:33 – 00:40
Nehemiah Bester
You're listening to Thinking Freely with the ACLU of Maryland. The show that talks about what's happening politically in Maryland, from the courts to the streets and everywhere in between.

00:40 – 01:10
Nehemiah Bester
I'm your host Nehemiah Bester. Every day in Maryland, children entangled in the legal justice system were questioned without a parent, guardian, or attorney present. Because of this they have faced criminal charges, prosecution, and incarceration without the basic due process rights that adults are entitled to. This is made worse for Black, Indigenous, and Children of Color, who are over-policed, assumed to be less innocent, and made to seem less deserving of proper treatment under the law as children.

01:10 – 01:34
Nehemiah Bester
Take the case of the Exonerated Harlem Park Three – when in 1983, teenagers Alfred Chestnut, Andrew Stewart, and Ransom Watkins were wrongly arrested and interrogated by police without their parents, legal guardian, or attorney present. As a result, they were sentenced to life in prison for a murder they did not commit. The three spent 36 years each behind bars before being exonerated in 2019.

01:34 – 02:01
Nehemiah Bester
Their lives effectively stolen, even though they had done nothing wrong. Their story, and too many other examples are why, in 2022, the ACLU of Maryland and our partners successfully passed the Child Interrogation Protection Act. This law now requires an attorney be consulted before a child is interrogated by law enforcement. The law also requires that parents or guardians are notified when a child is taken into custody.

02:01 – 02:26
Nehemiah Bester
To me it seems pretty simple. Defending the rights of children should not be optional, and Ransom Watkins sat down to talk with me about it. Before we get into the conversation Ransom sent me some personal notes ahead of the interview that I’m going to share now with his permission. It goes like this: my name is Ransom Watkins. My childhood was taken from me when I was 16 years old.

02:26 – 02:50
Nehemiah Bester
I grew up in West Baltimore. I came from a poor family but with a million dollars’ worth of love. My mother passed away when I was 15 years old. She told me not to become what people want me to, I raised you as a loving son, don’t change for anybody. I did all I could to make my mother proud. I was a good kid.

02:50 – 03:13
Nehemiah Bester
One night in 1983 I woke up with guns in my face. The police snatched me out of bed and arrested me for murder. At the age of 16 years old I had to become a man. I lived my life through ups and downs, disappointments, and some really scary moments. I wondered if I would ever get out of prison. After 36 years of false incarceration,

03:13 – 03:34
Nehemiah Bester
I came home to a whole new world. Since that time, I have worked different jobs, got married, got my driver’s license, and bought my first car. Even though I live my life as a man, the child still struggles. Faith kept me strong.

03:34 – 03:56
Nehemiah Bester
So, I want to thank you, sir, for taking the time to talk with me today. It's truly a privilege to speak with you. I’ve been wanting to speak with you for a long time, actually. I know your story, and so I just really appreciate you being here and taking the time out. Can you tell me about the situation that happened when you were a teenager at Harlem Park Junior High?

03:56 – 04:21
Ransom Watkins
Yeah. In 1983, 16 years old. You know, life, just a kid that loved life. Me and my, my two best friends, Andrew Stewart, and Chestnut. That morning, we had went to Harlem Park Junior High to receive his jacket from his brother who wore it to school. But in the process of going in the school building, which we went to that school for three years.

04:21 – 04:47
Ransom Watkins
So personally, everybody knows us. But even though all of us was in high school. I live right across the street from the school, so everybody knows who we are. So, we went back that morning in 1983 to retrieve his jacket from his brother. But in the process of doing all that, being in the school, the security guard, had saw us which he knew us personally. You know what I’m saying he knew us personally. And we was walking around looking for the class.

04:47 – 05:03
Ransom Watkins
But at the same time, we kids so we were just acting like you know, like clowns. Everybody knows us so we joking with some of the people in the class. But when the security guard saw us, he was like, man, you know, y'all can't be in here. So imma have to ask y’all to leave imma escort y’all out the building.

05:03 – 05:29
Ransom Watkins
But we like ight Mr. Kelly ain't no problem. We cool with that because he knows us. And at the time, you know, we walking and we talking to him, and he escorted us off the premise. In the process, going through our whole day, we learned later on when we were back home that somebody had got killed in the school. Now, we were just as shocked as anybody else because nothing like that never really happened round our way in school.

05:30 – 05:51
Ransom Watkins
So, when we heard it, we were just shocked. We didn't know who it had happened to. Which for us, it didn't matter because we knew it was somebody young, you know. So, everybody was like, man, that’s messed up. But then we learned that it was a friend of ours named DeWitt Duckett, who also was a friend of the neighborhood. You know, everybody live in the neighbor, we are all just friends.

05:51 – 05:51
Nehemiah Bester
Yeah everybody knew each other.

05:51 – 06:12
Ransom Watkins
He was younger than us. But we speak, we know each other, and we found out that it was him, which basically just blew our mind. And through the course of that day that's all everybody talked about, about someone getting killed in the school. And then probably like three days or something later, the police come.

06:12 – 06:35
Ransom Watkins
We standing outside, by where we live it. The police just come and get us, you know, they ask us some questions, without our parents though. So, they knew they supposed to have our parents. But us looking up to police, like that's how I was raised. So, to me, I'm looking like they're going to do the right thing. They asking can they question us, oh yeah, sure I’ll go with you. I don’t really know that I’m supposed to have my parents but, they know that.

06:36 – 06:56
Ransom Watkins
But the way they got us is that they rode us around in the neighborhood, which basically letting other people see our face. That this was – as I got older, I come to find out this is what they used to do in the neighborhoods. They would put you in the back of the car, ride you around, let people see you.

06:56 – 07:16
Ransom Watkins
Right. And it's like a tactic that they use against kids, you know? But with us we not thinking like that because we kids, like they police man they gonna do the right thing. They just ask us questions, so we didn’t lie to them. Like was y’all up the school building? Yeah, we was up there early like about 11 o’clock, 12 o’clock.

07:18 – 07:36
Ransom Watkins
They said the murder happened around one, right? We wasn’t even in the building. But we never lied to them about being in the building. You know, if you trying to hide something you not gonna tell the people, whether somebody said you was in there or not you not going to agree to that. So, we just like, yes sir, you know, it was five of us and that's what we told him, the truth.

07:36 – 07:54
Ransom Watkins
It was five of us in the building. It wasn’t no three people. It was five of us together. So how y’all come out to three people? Y’all lying because we telling y’all that it was five of us and the other two guys that y'all didn't lock up is agreeing that they was in the building with us.

07:54 – 08:12
Ransom Watkins
So, it doesn't make sense for an individual to put they self on a homicide y’all say happened there and they know that they was with us that don’t even make sense. So, they never questioned other two guys that was with us. But the whole time they telling the police, man, we know they didn't do it because they was with us. If they did it, we did it.

08:12 – 08:33
Ransom Watkins
So why are we not in trouble? But unfortunately, man, I come to realize in this country, race played a lot of, played a big part in my case. You know, that was – once the news media got a hold of our case. Now, they had a witness from day one told the police who had done the murder, but he never investigated it.

08:33 – 08:55
Ransom Watkins
He said it was his privilege not to do so because he chose not to. But that's evidence they could have, could’ve cut us free right there. We wouldn't even have had to go to court. But they chose not to do that, right. And you know, it was, it’s tough man when you sixteen.

08:55 – 09:23
Nehemiah Bester
Of course and that – first, I'm sorry all that happened to you, Alfred, and Andrew. And for one you know, that sounds like very lazy policing, you know, not willing to go and investigate it. Can you tell me, how did you feel during that interrogation? Because you didn't have your parents with you. You know, in other cases, like folks, you know, if they don't have a parent or legal representation, they kind of are coerced into saying things. So how did you feel during that interrogation?

09:23 – 09:41
Ransom Watkins
Well first of all you looking at kids who ain't been in trouble. So, for us, this is like a nightmare. You’re in an uncomfortable environment without anybody that you know, and you don't have your parents. Because, you know, that's the first thing that kids ask for is their parents.

09:41 – 10:00
Ransom Watkins
So, with me, it was my father. Like where my father at? Cause you got me in a room by myself, and I need somebody in my family. Because I don’t know what’s going on. And I'm confused because I told you the truth. But you keep trying to get me to say something, that's not the truth.

10:02 – 10:20
Ransom Watkins
But I was built on that. Like my family, look, if you some you didn't do. I don't care what they try to - don’t you ever admit to something you didn't do. But if you did it then you stand up for it. So that's where I was at, in that room that police. No matter how much he tried to intimidate me, I wasn’t going to sit up there and tell you I killed somebody. I know I didn't kill nobody.

10:20 – 10:43
Ransom Watkins
Regardless of what you say, how much pressure you put on me, it’s not going to happen, right. Because that's how I was raised. But it was so intimidating to be in that room with him because everything he done in that room, he made it like ten times aggressive, like in your face. Like you know you did it.

10:44 – 11:03
Ransom Watkins
Sir I didn't do nothing, I’m telling you that I didn't do anything. Then they play the tactic game. Well, I just talked to Mr. Chestnut and Mr. Stewart, and they told me that you did it. So, I don't need no more testimony from you. Now, but I'm going to give you the opportunity to clear yourself. So, did they do it or did you do it?

11:03 – 11:06
Nehemiah Bester
Try to get you all to lie on each other.

11:06 – 11:20
Ransom Watkins
Right, and I'm telling them, like, man, listen, I didn't do it and they didn't do it. So, if sitting here telling me that they told you that they did it they lying. I'm not – I don't know what you said to them in that room, but they lying. They did not do it I was with them.

11:20 – 11:39
Ransom Watkins
I know they didn't. So that was a big thing in our case, right. And like none of us never, once, we always told the truth and we never deviated from the truth for 36 years. You know I'm saying like this, when you lie one thing you learn about a lie, you have to keep trying to remember what you said.

11:39 – 11:50
Ransom Watkins
Our case went along as no matter what you asked us from ‘83, from 36 years later, we're going to tell it to you like it was ’83. Because it was the truth.

11:50 – 11:52
Nehemiah Bester
It was consistent.

11:52 – 12:20
Ransom Watkins
We were consistent with everything that we were saying. And if you look at the transcripts or – see this the thing about the law. When you have Black judges who try to move up the ladder, such as my judge. Because you sealed evidence that could have – that could have stopped the trial, you sealed it. You are a judge of the court.

12:20 – 12:46
Ransom Watkins
You sworn to uphold law yourself. But yet that evidence that should have went to my lawyer, that could have stopped this trial, you sealed it. And nobody, and my lawyers and them never seen it. So, where's the fair justice at for kids in this country? If you have the judges and the prosecutors working together? I don't, I don't know how you get justice out of that, you know.

12:46 – 12:56
Ransom Watkins
So maybe some things need to be changed with the relationships with the judges and the prosecutors.

12:56 – 13:17
Nehemiah Bester
At the time, you know, this is 83 and 84. How do you think those relationships in the judicial system impacted your case specifically? They could withhold evidence which they did in our case in 83. Well, so because it seems to me like this was a huge rush to judgment.

13:17 – 13:29
Nehemiah Bester
Right? I remember reading that I think it took them 3 hours of deliberation before you all were convicted. Right. So, how did that - what was the impact of all of that?

13:29 – 13:41
Ransom Watkins
I think when you have like I tell people this, in a case like ours when you have publicized cases, people are, most people already made they judgment.

13:41 – 14:09
Ransom Watkins
People don't realize that. Because it was so, it was on news seven days a week, right. And if you constantly hearing about a young person getting killed and you seen it on news and then you’re picked as a juror, you already have formed an opinion about them kids, right. Nobody took into consideration that we was kids who ain’t never been in trouble, locked up or anything.

14:09 – 14:39
Ransom Watkins
Nobody took that into consideration. We come from poor backgrounds, but we had parents who loved us, which people overlook. We weren’t bad kids. We weren’t perfect kids, but we wasn’t bad kids neither, right. And I think with the system now, it’s going to be harder because like, imma give you a prime example. Like in our case, nobody gets punished for what happened to us for 36 years.

14:39 – 15:10
Ransom Watkins
Right? They pay you. But how is that punishment? So let me say this – if the police in the street know that he can fabricate evidence, right, and nothing will happen, he don't lose his job, he don't lose his pension, he don't do anything. What deter the officer behind him from stop doing the same thing? Nothing right? But if you start taking they pensions and letting them know that if you do this, you're going to be held accountable for this. We will punish you.

15:10 – 15:30
Ransom Watkins
If is not with jail time, we will take your pension. And I think that need to be done because nobody has been held accountable. Like in our case, yeah, you paid us off. But who actually paid for it? Our family, DeWitt Duckett family and us. Everybody else walked free. Everybody else get to still – like this police he still gets to see his kid graduate.

15:30 – 15:48
Ransom Watkins
He still gets to see his grandkids and everybody. So, he living a normal life, he ain't go through nothing. What do he care? So, what the state paid him, it didn’t come out of his, he's saying I'm good. I'm not paying. Right. But that's on the backs of taxpayers.

15:48 – 15:59
Ransom Watkins
That's who paying the price. But no one's seem to care about that. Because every time an officer do that, the taxpayers have to front that money somehow and that ain't fair to the people.

15:59 – 16:14
Nehemiah Bester
Yeah, and I think like, you know, that's one of the issues that we're facing right now. Like, what's the difference between justice and accountability? True justice is like you three would never have had to go through this at all.

16:14 – 16:38
Nehemiah Bester
And then the other part of that, officers not fully being held to account for what they did and how that impacts you and your friends and your families. Because you can't, there's no way to give back 36 years like you can't. That's not possible.

16:38 – 17:25
Ransom Watkins
Right, and they got to realize that man our families have suffered so much. Right, along with us. Like for us we never stopped suffering. The abuse that they dealt us as a child is with you for the rest of your life. Like I have seen so much as a child going into an adult system that people couldn't even imagine. Like that, that's hard like that stuff is always here. When you hear the screams, you remember all that. Your socializing with people is not as normal as person being in society. You know, your paranoia is outrageous because the environment that you've been in, that's all you knew.

17:25 – 17:27
Nehemiah Bester
Right, how do you get your mental health back?

17:27 – 17:49
Ransom Watkins
Right. And the first thing people are like you got your freedom – do I? So, you think cause you see me out here I’m smiling and I'm talking and I'm, but you don’t know what's going on here. And that's what people be missing that you really suffer bad, like you suffer. And then you feel like no one gets it, like they really don't get it.

17:49 – 18:06
Nehemiah Bester
Nah, and I think a lot of folks don’t understand that you have to reacclimate yourself back into society after you've been on the inside for so long. For a crime you didn't you never did in the first place.

18:06 – 18:26
Ransom Watkins
It’s not as easy as people make it seem. See what happened to you didn't happen over a year or two years. It happened for 36 years. So, you may not never reach that point where everything that's going on with you that you can fix. Because this didn't happen overnight. So, it's not going to end overnight. You know what I’m saying like this is going to be with you for your entire life.

18:26 – 18:42
Ransom Watkins
So, it’s a part of you and you go through it because sometimes you just don't want to, you just want to be alone. When you can't connect with your own family. Like that's just, man. People don't get it.

18:42 – 19:03
Nehemiah Bester
Ransom can you talk about how all of that has sort of like impacted your life today? Can you elaborate on like your routines, your lifestyle. How is what you've gone through for those 36 years – how has it impacted you? I mean on paper, you're free, but how has that impacted your life today? Can you talk about that?

19:03 – 19:30
Ransom Watkins
You really not because... I'm not an emotional type of being, you know, and I'm married. But I'm not that emotional person. I'm more of a paranoid person than anything. Right. When you can’t even go out to have a simple meal without doing, without being paranoid.

19:30 – 19:55
Ransom Watkins
This all the stuff that affects your life. Even when you driving. Certain jobs, you don't work because you don't feel comfortable in that environment. It’ll even go that far. Cause man I can't take that job because I can't. You know certain things like I got to keep moving. Like if I wanted an office job, can't do an office job, I got to keep my body moving at all time.

19:55 – 20:13
Ransom Watkins
So that affects you wanting to do some of the things that you want to do. I don't like to travel because I don't like to be in crowds. So that affects part of my marriage because my wife, she wants to travel. You know, and little things that we want to do. I'm just not big on going away.

20:13 – 20:34
Ransom Watkins
I'm more safer here than I am out there. Because in my mind, in prison I knew where I was at, I knew everybody, and I had that type of rapport with people where I didn't have to worry about violence. Right. So, all that for me was comfort. Now you took me from that setting and then you let me loose out here where I know nothing.

20:34 – 20:56
Ransom Watkins
Regular function technology that people take for granted. That kids know that we don't know. You know, these are the things that stop your life from going forward. So, in a sense, we stuck out here too. You know, people be like all you got to do is just, oh, just try to make - it’s hard when you can’t.

20:56 – 21:10
Ransom Watkins
People don’t understand it's hard to focus when your mind is going through so much. That you've been through so much that you can't even go to a restaurant and just have a normal dinner, without always…

21:10 – 21:14
Nehemiah Bester
Looking over your shoulder.

21:14 – 21:38
Ransom Watkins
Yeah, because everybody come in and do I need to see, and I need to sit where I can watch everybody. So, our life, our life is different out here. And it’s hard sometimes to ask for help. Because you're like, man, I would have known all this stuff if I was here. Then you feel some kind of, feel some kind of way because it's like they've done this to me. I didn't do this to them. And no apology. No, nothing. You're good, now.

21:38 – 22:02
Ransom Watkins
No therapy. I got to get my own therapy: you know I had to get my own therapy. Whatever it is that I had to get, I had to get with people to help me to maneuver around that. I had to get my driver's license, I had to give him a Social Security number. But had I not had help I wouldn't have done none of that, imma be honest with you. I wouldn’t because my paranoia wouldn't even allow me to go forward to take them steps.

22:02 – 22:29
Ransom Watkins
So, without having people pushing me to do that, it’d be like I still be in a cell. It's harsh man, its harsh that they get away with it. It’s harsh that they do it. You know? And they need to come to the table. I don't never think you can correct the system because the system is too corrupt. I don't know how you correct that.

22:29 – 22:59
Ransom Watkins
I've been, me and my brothers we've been talking about it. How do you correct when you have a judge who have knowledge of evidence and he don't give it to my lawyer? How do you correct that when they find out years later and they can’t do nothing to the judge because he retired. So how do you correct it? I don't know. But I know I'm not the only one. I know we're not the only ones that that happened to.

22:59 – 23:12
Nehemiah Bester
Right, it’s very systemic. And on the systemic part of it, this like you just said, you're not the only ones to have gone through this. And unfortunately, you all might not be the last to have gone through it.

23:12 – 23:40
Nehemiah Bester
You all were kids when this happened and even today, like, you know, Black and Brown kids are still being stopped and interrogated without their parent or a legal guardian present. Even though, like, you know, the Child Interrogation Act was passed. And so, I want to ask you, why do you feel it's important that children are protected from situations like that? Why do you feel like that act is important and why and why children's rights in general must be protected?

23:40 – 24:06
Ransom Watkins
Well, I always go back to myself as a child. See if my rights had been protected back then, I wouldn’t, we wouldn't be sitting here now. See that's the fault of that because of that, that's why we are sitting here. No one was protecting us back then.

24:06 – 24:35
Ransom Watkins
But see now you have laws in place for that. That's what people have to look at. In our case, somebody could have stepped up. Said listen, these are juveniles. We think they should have their parents. But I had a detective named Detective Kincaid and he was what I call cocky. He’d do things his way and he made it clear, I don’t need their parents.

24:35 – 25:05
Ransom Watkins
He made that real clear. Imma question them with their parents or without their parents. But you need that on the books to protect the child. You really do. Because somebody's going to be held accountable some kind of way, you know? But if you know that on the books, no one could be held accountable for it. So, I think that is very important that that's always on the books.

25:05 – 25:31
Ransom Watkins
Yeah, that's you know, that's number one. In order for a child to have some type of parent or guardian, there with them when they’re being questioned by anybody, you know. Yeah, I think that's very important. It would have helped us. One hundred percent it would have helped us because my parents would have been there. But because they knew that they didn't have to call them, and they understood that.

25:31 – 25:54
Ransom Watkins
So, with that, they got away with it, right. But had that been on the books, had that been a part of that case, then in this case would have never reached this far. So, you most definitely need that there. But I come to find that, I think we need to have some more stiff laws on the books for the children because man listen.

25:54 – 26:25
Ransom Watkins
You got to protect the children. We got to. You know, there's children being abused and there’s children being taken advantage of, and I just think having them laws on the books protects, it protects the children.

26:11 – 26:28
Nehemiah Bester
And it opens a window of further accountability where we can, because then you have more avenues where officers who do commit these interrogations to teenagers and children, okay, we have this law in place you can be held accountable.

26:28 – 26:48
Nehemiah Bester
I want to end on like a lighter note if that's okay. I know, you've done since you got out, you've done, like, tremendous work in your community. You know lot of philanthropic stuff, a lot of extracurricular activities. Can you just talk about how, you know, all the amazing work that you've done in your community, some of your favorite hobbies. You know, just how has your community - how have you been an asset to your community since you've been out?

26:58 – 27:11
Ransom Watkins
Oh, man, I've been man I’ve been listen, that's one thing I'm like, I'm big on. I'm big on giving back. And before I had got hurt on my job, doing a job I had tore my rotator cuff in five places and they had to put a plate in my neck.

27:11 – 27:36
Ransom Watkins
But before that I was doing volunteer work on this farm with kids. And we'd take inner city kids to the farm, and they’d ride horses. Because the horse can communicate with a kid the way that we don't even understanding. Horses are smart and I’ve been loving horses my whole life. But I had this one little girl who come from the inner city, and she’s been abused a lot.

27:36 – 27:59
Ransom Watkins
She like about nine, she don't talk. Listen this little girl, she was at the program before I got there, and she never talked to nobody. So that night was my night to get her, and I just walked the horse. I’m holding onto the horse, she riding the horse. I ain’t say nothing because I'm letting her get the feel of it.

27:59 – 28:20
Ransom Watkins
She's looking at me like, then she’ll turn her head look at me again. So, I’m like I got to find a way to communicate with her, so I use school. I say, what's your best subject in school? So, she like math. I'm like, oh, you're really smart in math? She said I think I'm really good. I said, okay, just lil numbers.

28:20 – 28:40
Ransom Watkins
How much is four plus five? And she’ll tell me. Oh, you really smart that is so good of you. I said, listen, I'm so proud of you. But man, imma tell you how that changed my life. Because during the course of that time I spent with that little girl, this was the amazing thing. This girl, don’t hug nobody, she don’t do none of that.

28:40 – 29:08
Ransom Watkins
And I left the program because I got hurt. And when I come back, she saw me, man, that little girl came running to me and hugged me. It's the little things like that. People don't understand that means everything. When you touch somebody that people that been around this kid for all this time couldn't touch. And it's like we made a connection, you know, I didn't push it, I just let it happen.

29:08 – 29:26
Ransom Watkins
But that was the most amazing thing to me. You know, I do a lot of volunteering you know, I do a lot of volunteering and I take care of a lot of kids. Like, I just give kids’ stuff, you know, I just buy stuff for kids. Just give it to them.

29:26 – 29:49
Ransom Watkins
For my community, we got a recreation center, where I donated a snowball machine last summer because, you know, they was like they needed one. Yeah. So, this it’s just the little things that you do to help out your community that people don't think mean a lot you know? So, I really want to buy them this summer, I want to get all them roller skates and I want to donate them to the recreation center that I was raised in. Even though the city wants to shut them all down.

29:49 – 30:00
Ransom Watkins
But if they try to shut this one down, I'm planning to try to work hard to keep it open because it really meant a lot to me as a child. So, I want to keep that going.

30:00 – 30:02
Nehemiah Bester
Yeah, it'll mean something to somebody else.

30:02 – 30:47
Ransom Watkins
Yeah, yeah, it’s my life goal man just to give back, it’s my life goal I don’t need much. But to put smiles on other people faces and kids’ faces, it means the world to me. Let me say one thing before I go. DeWitt Duckett, his mother, right? Because she lost a child. And I say this man you know, with all sincerity, I keep her in my prayers. Because this woman went 36 years believing that her son murderer was caught. Then come to find out 36 years later that they wasn’t. We weren’t the ones who did it.

30:47 – 31:12
Ransom Watkins
But she stated that she don't believe that right. I don't fault her for that bruh. I understand it's a mother that’s morning for her child. And she’s hurting, she got to believe something in order to keep going. But I want people to know man, that listen, I love DeWitt mother, always will and will continue to pray for her. You know and hoping that one day she can just face the truth for what it is.

31:12 – 31:33
Ransom Watkins
But if she never face it, man, I still want God to let her go in peace. You know, yeah, I'm big on that man, and I just want his mother to have some type of comfort because it mean a lot to me man. You know, I don't care about her not recognizing us.

31:33 – 31:45
Ransom Watkins
Y'all the ones who killed my son. If that's what you want to believe, in order for your life to function then you go ahead. But I want you to know that I'm going to continue to pray for her and keep my spirits man, yeah.

31:45 – 31:52
Nehemiah Bester
I mean, listen, this is obviously our first-time meeting, right? And I feel like this brought so much light to my day.

31:52 – 32:13
Nehemiah Bester
You know, it’s just awesome to hear that you’re bringing so much more light to your community. And I just I mean, I feel very honored to speak with you. It's been wonderful listening to and seeing your humanity and just knowing that you've had so much taken from you, and yet you still are offering so much to give back.

32:13 – 32:40
Nehemiah Bester
You know, I think that's just very beautiful to see. So just thank you Ransom for talking with me and sharing your story today.

32:20 – 32:30
Ransom Watkins
I appreciate it, man. Any time you want to talk to me, man, you know, hit me up, man. I'm here.

32:30 – 32:41
Nehemiah Bester
Thanks for joining us on this episode of Thinking Freely. If you enjoyed this conversation, please feel free to leave a like, comment, and share to your networks.

32:41 – 33:06
Nehemiah Bester
And if you want to learn more about defending children’s rights go to aclu-md.org. And finally, don’t forget to subscribe to Thinking Freely wherever you get your podcast. This show was recorded on Piscataway land. I’m Nehemiah Bester, the host and producer of Thinking Freely. See y’all next time.


Thinking Freely, ACLU of Maryland's podcast, informs Marylanders about what's happening politically – from the courts to the streets – so they can get involved and realize a more equitable Maryland for all. 

SUBSCRIBE ON:

Apple Podcast | Spotify | SoundCloud | Stitcher | Listen Notes | RadioPublic | Pandora

Date

Friday, February 2, 2024 - 1:15pm

Featured image

Ransom Watkins is a Black man wearing a blue baseball hat, glasses, has a short gray beard, and is wearing a blue shirt. He is standing outside.

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Related issues

Children's Rights Racial Justice Police Practices

Show related content

Pinned related content

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Share Image

Thinking Freely podcast by ACLU of Maryland

Type

Menu parent dynamic listing

839

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

Show list numbers

The transcript is available below.

The 287(g) agreement with ICE in Frederick County must end. In July, the ACLU of Maryland joined the national ACLU to file a federal administrative complaint calling on the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to investigate the Frederick County Sheriff, Charles Jenkins to end the dangerous agreement that promotes anti-immigrant hate and deportation.  
 
On this episode of Thinking Freely, you’ll hear from Sergio Espana, the ACLU of Maryland’s director of engagement and mobilization in an exclusive interview with Maria Caceres, the community affairs director at El Zol 107.9 to discuss the issue and the details of the complaint.

Produced by: Nehemiah Bester, communications strategist at ACLU de Maryland
Parts read by: Neydin Milián, communications strategist at ACLU de Maryland
 
This podcast was recorded on Piscataway land.


TRANSCRIPT

00:00 – 00:22
Sergio España
We want to know that our federal government is also enforcing the law fairly for all. Like we‘ve been talking about since 2008, year after year after year, there have been cases of abuse from the Office that have been proven through lawsuits. There has been abuse of people who are detained.

00:29 – 00:43
Neydin Milián
You’re listening to Thinking Freely with the ACLU of Maryland. The show that talks about what’s happening politically in Maryland from the courts, to the streets, and everywhere in between. I’m Neydin Milián.

00:43 – 00:51
Nehemiah Bester
And I’m Nehemiah Bester, this episode of Thinking Freely will be in Spanish.

00:51 – 01:43
Neydin Milián
In July, the ACLU of Maryland joined the national ACLU to file a federal administrative complaint calling on the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to investigate the Frederick County Sheriff, Charles Jenkins and end the harmful 287g agreement between ICE and the Sheriffs’ Office. The Sheriff has used this 287g agreement to promote anti-immigrant hate and deport and detain community members. The ACLU of Maryland’s Director of Engagement and Mobilization, Sergio Espana sat down with Community Affairs Director, Maria Caceres from radio station El Zol, 107.9 to discuss the issue as well as next steps in the complaint.

01:43 – 02:11
María Cáceres
(Song: María José Cáceres, getting you closer to your community in your Zol family.) Thank you for joining us for these 60 minutes of your Zol family. Now we're going to feature an interview with Sergio España from the ACLU, who I'm going to talk to about an administrative complaint with the Department of Homeland Security against Frederick County Sheriff Jenkins, Sergio España next and we welcome him.

02:11 – 02:55
Sergio España
Good morning and thanks for the invitation. I am Sergio España. I am the director of Mobilization for the ACLU of Maryland. We are a national organization, but we also have offices in each state and I am part of our office in Maryland. We all focus on the civil rights of all Marylanders, regardless of immigration status, race, gender. And we work with the community to make sure that the community knows their rights, knows how to protect themselves, and also participates with us in advocacy to make sure that our elected officials and our police officers respect the law and apply it fairly to everyone.

02:55 – 03:05
María Cáceres
Sergio, we know that the ACLU of Maryland has filed a federal administrative complaint with the Department of Homeland Security. What can you tell us about it?

03:05 – 03:57
Sergio España
It's not a lawsuit in the sense that it's in court, but we are asking the Department of Homeland Security's office at Homeland Security to do a formal investigation into how the Fredrick County Sheriff, Sheriff Chuck Jenkins, how he is enforcing his office and ensuring that he is applying the law as it should be, fairly. We need to do this at the federal level, because, well, it's been year after year after year, where we've had reason to be concerned with the facts, starting in 2008, almost just getting started, he as sheriff, he started a program, he joined a federal program called 287g that trains local sheriff's officers to act like they were ICE agents.

03:57 – 05:10
Sergio España
And then they could, when people are arrested, also process them under the ICE database to see their immigration status and from there connect directly with immigration officers to pick them up. And what we've seen since 2008 is over 1,500 Frederick residents have been deported and the vast majority were deported for things that simply weren't violent. It's not that they were involved with gangs or under investigation for theft, things of that sort. Most of the cases that started that kind of process were for civil violations and license violations or traffic violations and things like that. With that said, the sheriff has used this program to dehumanize the immigrant community in Frederick and place a sense of fear there. He is well allied with members of President Trump's group. He has been to several parties with him and with many people who are connected to the Trump organization, many of whom have also been arrested or sued for criminal practices.

05:11 – 05:33
Sergio España
We have already sued and won several times against this program at the local level, where they could no longer be doing what they were doing years ago, when they stopped people, before being arrested, they were already trying to communicate with ICE. Now, that surely isn't happening anymore. Fewer and fewer people have been prosecuted under this program, but it is still in law and it is still

05:33 – 06:18
Sergio España
being practiced when people are already detained at the Frederick Detention Center. Separately, it is how he has applied this program. We have hesitated on speaking about the philosophy of how he applies the law, besides him being associated with the Trump administration, which at the end of the day is something clearly, it is politics and everything. He has also had connections with racist organizations. There is no other way to say it. Organizations connected to movements that say they are constitution movements, constitutional movements, but the focus is on making sure the sheriffs apply the law however they want, without having to follow federal laws or federal rights laws.

06:18 – 07:18
Sergio España
And also most recently in March, he's also been sued and is under federal criminal investigation, the same thing he's been projecting onto the immigrant community. Right now, he's under federal investigation and he's starting to go to court and he's charged, basically, with lying to the federal government to get access to machine guns, violent pistols that could only be used by police. But those machine guns were used to rent, to rent to community members associated with Jenkins and his allies privately and, in that way, according to what is happening in court and the investigation, those rentals were also used to help the sheriff gain political favor at the local level and also to help their allies raise funds and from there they used them to support their, their election.

07:18 – 08:24
Sergio España
In other words, right now he is dealing with the court, we cannot say how, if he is guilty or not, but it is something very, very serious. And it also comes, it's another point, coming to our concern about how he's doing, we know that he has abused the 287g program in the past and with what's going on in court, it gave us pause, in what other ways, basically, is he abusing the office in a general way? We want to make sure that the Department of Homeland Security does the necessary investigation, aside from what is happening with him being prosecuted in court, to ensure that the law is applied fairly to everyone in Frederick.

08:26 – 08:12
María Cáceres
During all these years that we have been informed about, well, the actions of Sheriff Jenkins, when we say sheriff in Spanish, is he the head of the Frederick Police Department or is he the sheriff in charge of the prison system?

08:12 – 08:13
Sergio España
No.

08:13 – 08:17
María Cáceres
Can you specify that for us, please?

08:17 – 09:25
Sergio España
Each county has its police with both Frederick. There is the Frederick City Police. But there's also the, uh, sheriff's office which is the General County police. The position of police chief at the local level, most of those are elected by people, by representatives of each county, be it the executive or members of the council. The sheriff is a position that is chosen. It is a political position. Also, that's why he is the person that he is, he has been elected, he is a Republican, elected with the conservative movement. Since 2008, basically, as the community has gotten more diverse and that has also affected who can vote, but the only position left with authority at the Republican level is the position of the sheriff in Frederick. So then, because of that, in the end, those connections at the national level, because the Republican Party sees him as someone that is exemplary for the republican movement at the state level and at the national level.

09:25 – 09:30
María Cáceres
What should his role be? The function of the Sheriff, speaking in an objective way.

09:30 – 09:58
Sergio España
In most counties, because they already have a lot, their own police departments, the focus is basically just overseeing the county detention center and that's part of the Frederick Sheriff's job, but other than that, the sheriff in Frederick, that county is more rural, many of the members of the sheriff's office work in a more general police capacity where they can stop people for any reason. Basically.

09:58 – 10:02
María Cáceres
So they do police work.

10:02 – 10:03
Sergio España
Yes.

10:03 – 10:08
María Cáceres
Now, regarding Sheriff Jenkins, we see that he obviously has political pretensions. No?

10:08 – 10:39
Sergio España
Yes, unfortunately, he, those desires, on a political level, the way in which he is developing that personality, those relationships, is partly the way in which he has been damaging the immigrant community. From what we see, almost purposefully, what we see when we talk about the 287g program is that most of the people who have been arrested, prosecuted, were not for violent acts, most were for civil violations, traffic violations or things like that.

10:39 – 11:08
Sergio España
And we also see how he wants to, heavy-handedly, dehumanize the population that is in the general detention center as well. Most who have not been accused and have not been found guilty. Another thing that happened at the beginning of this year is that in the detention center where the sheriff is in charge, there was a break in the plumbing, where. These details are going to be, they are going to be painful.

11:08 – 11:49
Sergio España
Listen, but basically, these humans, this was coming out of the plumbing of the same, the jails of almost an entire block of detention centers and for days, for days, dozens of people arrested had to be in their own feces, so, many people got sick or had problems. And when the community was following what was happening when they could communicate with family, the sheriff's office in secret is saying that the problem was not as serious as we know it to be. Also there needs to be an investigation, because many people got sick because of that.

11:49 – 11:56
María Cáceres
The people who are detained in the center were like this for many days?

11:56 – 11:57
Sergio España
Yes.

11:57 – 11:59
María Cáceres
It is unfortunate. Was this problem solved?

11:59 – 12:14
Sergio España
Yes, it was solved and we know that it was for at least four days, it could be a little longer. And we also know that the level of cleaning was not adequate and took too long, separately, simply, in the end, there is no plumbing anymore.

12:14 – 12:28
María Cáceres
Sergio, now, before this complaint that, as you have very well said, is not a legal lawsuit, but rather an administrative complaint so that the Department of Homeland Security can investigate Sheriff Jenkins. What are you all hoping for? What does the ACLU of Maryland expect?

12:28 – 13:45
Sergio España
We hope the truth comes out. We want to know that our federal government is also enforcing the law fairly for all. Like we‘ve been talking about since 2008, year after year after year, there have been cases of abuse from the Office that have been proven through lawsuits. There has been abuse of people who are detained, like what just happened recently in the detention center and now also this case, where they are basically, he himself could be jailed for what is happening right now with the investigation where he was renting machine guns to gain political connections at the local level. All of those things are in the public records, but he still follows through with the 287g program. The sheriff, although he's saying that he's, supposedly, not working right now because he's under investigation and could be in jail. He says that he is not working, but we also know that he still has access to the resources of the sheriff's office. He's still driving the sheriff’s office’s cars. He is still giving official presentations for the office, including the annual presentation on the 287g program.

13:45 – 14:10
Sergio España
In other words, he is basically acting without impunity. After more than a decade, of that kind of abuse, we want to make sure the federal government does its job and makes sure the law is applied fairly for everyone. And for that, it means we simply need a more formal investigation of what has been brought to light thanks to the efforts of individuals in Frederick who have ensured that their voices are heard.

14:10 – 14:15
María Cáceres
Through this 287g agreement, does the sheriff's office receive funding, Sergio?

14:15 – 15:07
Sergio España
Yes, they receive funds. Most of the funding comes for the training the officers receive and for support with resources along with access to the ICE data center. And there was another program that we were able to end thanks to the efforts of the immigrant community in Frederick and at the state level. There was another program that the sheriff was involved with, where there was more money coming into the detention center. The center was basically being rented out so that people who were being processed by ICE could stay there in the detention center and basically use it as, like a federal jail and they decided to pay in the hundreds of dollars for each night they spent there, and there for sure, were being given money. But thanks to local efforts, we managed to end that program two years ago.

15:07 – 15:38
María Cáceres
And there is some possibility that this program, this cooperation between Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Frederick County Sheriff's Office could be terminated if it is proven, well, and there are also cases that you have won. Sergio, obviously there are aspects that are proven, right? But if everything you are exposing about Sheriff Jenkins' actions is proven,

15:38 – 15:48
Sergio España
Yes, there are two ways. The easiest way is that the sheriff could end the program whenever he wants. That is completely mandatory. The bailiff can terminate the lease at any time.

15:49 – 16:14
María Cáceres
Next week we continue with the second part of this interview with Sergio España, director of Mobilization at the ACLU. Here in your family Zol. (Song: María Esther Cáceres, in your family Zol 107.9)

16:14 – 16:39
Neydin Milián
This has been another episode of Thinking Freely. For more information, visit aclu-md.org and be sure to listen to WLZL El Zol 107.9 FM. This podcast was recorded on Piscataway land. I'm Neydin Milián, thanks for listening.

16:39 – 16:59
Nehemiah Bester
And for those still here, this is Nehemiah Bester closing it out in English. This has been another episode of Thinking Freely. If you want to learn more visit aclu-md.org and special thank you to El Zol 107.9FM for allowing us to reshare this interview. This podcast was recorded on Piscataway land. Thanks for listening.


Thinking Freely, ACLU of Maryland's podcast, informs Marylanders about what's happening politically – from the courts to the streets – so they can get involved and realize a more equitable Maryland for all. 

SUBSCRIBE ON:

Apple Podcast | Spotify | SoundCloud | Stitcher | Listen Notes | RadioPublic | Pandora

Date

Friday, August 18, 2023 - 1:15pm

Featured image

Thinking Freely ACLU of Maryland Podcast

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Related issues

Immigrants' Rights Police Practices Racial Justice

Show related content

Pinned related content

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Share Image

ACLU of Maryland's Thinking Freely podcast on SoundCloud. The upper left corner has a play button and the name of the episode, "Pensar libremente: ACLU Presenta Una Queja Federal Contra El Alguacil Del Condado De Frederick." Thinking Freely logo.

Type

Menu parent dynamic listing

839

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

Show list numbers

The podcast transcript is available below.

WATCH THE VIDEO


Half a decade ago, Dana Vickers Shelley walked into the ACLU of Maryland as the new executive director ready to make "good trouble" in the name of working to guarantee the promise of Maryland’s constitution for all Marylanders. Five years have gone by, but the mission remains the same.

Listen as Dana reflects on her 5th anniversary as executive director and how the ACLU of Maryland remains committed to empowering Marylanders to exercise their rights so that the law values and uplifts their humanity. This episode was adapted from the keynote speech Dana delivered to the Pro Bono Resource Center of Maryland’s Standing for Justice Conference in May.

Written and read by: Dana Vickers Shelley, executive director at the ACLU of Maryland

Produced by: Nehemiah Bester, communications strategist at the ACLU of Maryland

This podcast was recorded on Piscataway land.


TRANSCRIPT

00:06 - 00:15
Dana Vickers Shelley
We exist to empower Marylanders to exercise their rights so the law values and uplifts their humanity, and fulfill the country's unrealized promise of justice and freedom for all.
 
00:15 - 00:50
Nehemiah Bester
You’re listening to Reading Freely with the ACLU of Maryland, an audio blog feature of our Thinking Freely podcast. Five Years of Making “Good Trouble,” Dana Vickers Shelley celebrates and reflects on her fifth anniversary as Executive Director of the ACLU of Maryland. Written and read by Dana Vickers Shelley, and adapted from the Keynote speech Dana delivered to the Pro Bono Resource Center of Maryland’s Standing for Justice Conference in May 2023.
 
00:50 - 01:15
Dana Vickers Shelley
In marking my five-year anniversary this summer as executive director of the ACLU of Maryland, I am reflecting on what our team has accomplished and how we are working differently to guarantee that the promise of Maryland's Constitution is accessible to all. Particularly those whose humanity was not considered at its founding.
 
01:15 - 01:42
Dana Vickers Shelley
As a grown-up Girl Scout and rabble rouser I collaborate with others to advocate for racial equity and justice, and I am dedicated to making what my hero, Congressman John Lewis, called “Good Trouble.” Each and every one of us at the ACLU of Maryland is a person who finds themselves proudly making “Good Trouble.” We are relentless so that we can protect, improve, and support democracy for everyone across the state.
 
01:42 - 02:11
Dana Vickers Shelley
Our community centered approach builds on decades of our historic expertise and strength in litigation and is making that work even more grounded and impactful than ever. Maryland was an early leader for ACLU affiliates across the country in intentionally centering racial justice in the legal cases we brought. We do this work on behalf of and with individuals, families and communities.
 
02:12 - 02:58
Dana Vickers Shelley
We are fortunate to be learning from and led by people who have firsthand experience with the failings of Maryland's discriminatory public systems, including voting rights, education, policing and incarceration. Over the past five years, we have refocused the organization's vision and mission. We exist to empower Marylanders to exercise their rights so the law values and uplifts their humanity. Our goal is to realize a Maryland where people are united in affirming and exercising their rights to address inequities and fulfill the country's unrealized promise of justice and freedom for all.
 
02:58 - 03:31
Dana Vickers Shelley
We are bold in naming racism, both personal and structural, as the foundation of the rights violations we see. Our current work is not a deviation from the past. It is a focusing, an expansion and a deepening of how our legal and policy programs have functioned over many years. We are combining key strategies of litigation, legal advocacy, communications, engagement and mobilization and policy advocacy to fulfill our mission.
 
03:31 - 04:15
Dana Vickers Shelley
We are naming the racism and oppressive laws and practices that thwart real change, and we back it up with facts. It is the ACLU's role to hold elected officials and policymakers accountable to our values. Sadly, we still have a state in the same shameful tradition of other former Confederate states like Mississippi and Alabama. When it comes to incarcerating Black men with long sentences, and we still have a state where the Fraternal Order of Police is invited to the table to set police accountability policy, while families who were forced to endure police violence are denied entry to those discussions.
 
04:15 - 04:54
Dana Vickers Shelley
We need to be strategic and visionary to dismantle, crush and chip away at the centuries old laws, practices and systems that keep Black folks, Indigenous Peoples, and People of Color from living our lives fully. How do we know our approach is working? Let me share some examples. This legislative session, the ACLU of Maryland and our partners secured a massive victory with the almost midnight sine die passage of legislation to end police stops and searches based on the alleged smell of marijuana.
 
04:54 - 05:22
Dana Vickers Shelley
We are defending voting rights in a redistricting case brought by Black voters in Federalsburg on the Eastern Shore. The seven Black women who brought the case to us are determined to end 200 years of white only rule, and we're right there with them in court and beyond. And we feel closer than ever to finally ending the racist federal 287(g) program in Maryland.
 
05:22 - 05:52
Dana Vickers Shelley
Local police should not be racially profiling for Immigration and Customs Enforcement under the guise of public safety. All of our work is paying off. Your continued support and partnership are so deeply appreciated and vital for more victories like these. We would not be here without member donors like you. Thank you for helping us to be the change we want to see in Maryland and across our country.
 
05:52 - 06:01
Nehemiah Bester
This has been an ACLU Maryland audio blog. If you want to learn more, visit aclu-md.org. Thanks for listening.
 


Catch Reading Freely bonus content on Thinking Freely, ACLU of Maryland's podcast that informs Marylanders about what's happening politically – from the courts to the streets – so they can get involved and realize a more equitable Maryland for all. 

SUBSCRIBE ON:

Apple Podcast | Spotify | SoundCloud | Stitcher | Listen Notes | RadioPublic | Pandora

Date

Tuesday, August 1, 2023 - 12:00pm

Featured image

Thinking Freely ACLU of Maryland Podcast

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Related issues

Racial Justice Immigrants' Rights Education Police Practices Voting Rights and Elections Rights of People in Prisons and Jails Legal Justice System

Show related content

Pinned related content

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Share Image

Thinking Freely banner logo in dark yellow and purple. There is a fist raised of a protester and the background shows a crowd of protesters. There is a filter treatment over the image to make it look distorted. The is a SoundCloud waveform on the bottom.

Type

Menu parent dynamic listing

839

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

Show list numbers

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Podcast